3D PrintAbility is an innovative toolchain we’ve developed alongside researchers at the University of Toronto.
It provides digital scanners, software called NiaFit, and 3D printers — everything a clinician needs to make a 3D printed prosthetic or orthotic.
3D PrintAbility improves on the traditional way of making prosthetics and orthotics by reducing the amount of time and money needed to make a device.
A start-to-finish toolchain of digital scanners, custom software called NiaFit, and 3D printers — all of the tools clinicians need to scan, design, and print custom transtibial prosthetic sockets and AFOs for children and youth, aged 5-25.
The patient’s residual limb is scanned with a 3D digital scanner.
A 3D model of the prosthetic socket or AFO is created using our software called NiaFit.
The device is printed on-site using a 3D printer. It is then assembled and fitted to the patient.
3D printing, or additive printing, is the process of producing a three dimensional object from a digital file using a special printer that lays downs material layer by layer.
Here’s a video of a 3D printer at work. The printer is producing a transtibial socket — a key component of a lower leg prosthetic.
Video: Time-lapse video of 3D printer making a prosthetic socket (0:22)
The time it takes to produce a device is significantly reduced.
Clinical evaluations show that our devices are comparable to traditionally-fabricated devices.
A more efficient, digital production process means fewer trips to the clinic.
Patients can usually be fitted and discharged with only one overnight stay.
Our technology is safe for technicians to use and operate.
Clinicians develop expertise and skills in the latest 3D technology.
3D PrintAbility mirrors the manual fabrication process, but it does so in a digital environment. Here’s how the methods compare:
In 2017, we completed a large-scale clinical study of 3D PrintAbility at four sites across Cambodia, Tanzania, and Uganda. In total, approximately 140 children were fitted with 3D printed devices, including 70 transtibial prosthetics and 70 ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs). The results of the studies validated the durability, safety, and appropriateness of our devices.
We also tested the durability of our devices using a 1 million step robotic fatigue test — meeting the standards under ISO 10328:2006.
Alongside researchers at the University of Toronto, we continue to test, validate, and refine our technology to ensure we remain a global leader.